serendipity escribió:
What about Prince Richard? What is he like? Did he sort of live in the shadow of this gorgeous older brother?
Everyone who I know who knows him, says he's a really nice, down-to-earth man. However, he's a deep thinker who often has his head in the clouds (a befuddled professor type). I once described him to a chum (who, as I mentioned in another thread, went to school with his daughter, Davina) as Prince Charles on intellectual steroids. She laughed and said, spot on.
I think Prince William was no less intelligent, but from what I've read and heard he was more worldly, had a much more knowable personality than his younger brother. First off, he was a playboy like his father Harry had been in his day. Remember Prince Harry was 35 before he married, and so was his mother. It was thought Harry would never marry, because he had so many affairs -- it was said of him that he was a confirmed bachelor with no intention of throwing away his liberty for a wife, dog and fireplace (but because he wasn't bisexual like George, he didn't figure in much of the gossip of the day. You know how much people like to be titiliated).
And Richard was married a few short months before William's death to that Danish girl, Birgitte van Deurs. He was a much more settled, homey character than his dashing brother.
I respect him a lot, but I think he is the type of royal who blends into the background, in the public's imagination -- like the Duke of Connaught in his day. And for a royalist like me, I would prefer a bit more presence about him, as Prince Michael of Kent has.
I mean, if you're going to be the grandson of a King, ACT like one. Don't act like just another member of the aristocracy, which is all one blur of titled names.
Personally, I would love to hear competing opinions about this.